Therapy with Mud Compresses for Knee Osteoarthritis: Comparison of Natural Mud Preparations with Mineral-Depleted Mud
Key Findings
- Prospective, double-blind, controlled trial: 58 knee osteoarthritis patients, natural mineral-rich mud compresses (n=40) vs. mineral-depleted mud compresses (n=18), applied at home 5x/week for 3 weeks
- The natural mineral-rich mud group showed a significant reduction in knee pain at every assessment point
- Mineral-depleted mud did not reproduce the same benefit — the authors concluded mineral/salt content is necessary for the therapeutic effect
A double-blind trial that isolates the mineral contribution of mud therapy by comparing natural mineral-rich mud against the same mud with minerals removed. Only the mineral-rich version produced significant pain reduction, directly supporting the idea that dissolved minerals — not just the mud’s physical matrix or heat — drive the therapeutic effect. The mud tested is characteristically Dead Sea black mud rather than peat, so this is read as general mineral-isolation evidence for the mechanism, not peat-specific proof. Abstract-only sourcing; no full text was located.
Where this source is used on this site
Each page below cites this paper as evidence for a specific claim. The note shows what the page draws from it.
Double-blind RCT (n=58, not peat-specific): natural mineral-rich mud compresses significantly reduced knee pain; mineral-depleted mud (same base, minerals removed) did not — mineral content necessary for effect, see mineral-delivery mechanism
Double-blind RCT (n=58, not peat-specific): natural mineral-rich mud compresses significantly reduced knee OA pain; mineral-depleted mud (identical base, minerals removed) did not reproduce the effect — direct single-study isolation of the mineral contribution